Talk:Comet (cleanser)

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

comment

Made of caustic soda?

Nope. The article has the active chemicals listed now. --Karuna8 03:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ingredients

All right, this article is completely different from what my Comet says. First off, the labels says it contains 0.9% "sodium dichloro-s-triazinetrione dihydrate" and not 1.2% like in the article. Also, there's somewhat more information on what remaining "inert" materials make up the ingredients such as calcium carbonate and sodium carbonate, and it describes the surfactants as "anionic". The rest reads "quality control agents, perfume," and "colour". (Momus (talk) 21:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I cleaned up the ingredients. It might be a bit technical and less precise now (1-5%), but it includes citations and gets rid of the rubbish about unknown ingredients. I came to the page to find out the ingredients. I too was disappointed with the page, so I did some research. It really wasn't hard to do better. Wiredrabbit (talk) 09:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Addictive?

Do people really eat it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.216.156.177 (talk) 05:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do people really eat Great Green Gobs of Greasy, Grimy Gopher Guts? AnonMoos (talk) 13:30, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Linkk for Ammonia + Chlorine = Danger

I am tempted to research and edit this article, but I never edit anything here, and I am no expert in chemistry or wikipedia standards. Could a link or text be inserted that indicates what chemical reactions happen when ammonia and bleach-based products mix? My mind is still reeling (in more than one way) after walking in on a friend who had just done this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim1977 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the sentence to try to clarify that mixing cleaners is dangerous in general. I don't think acid-base reactions etc, should be in this article, but could be a subject for a new article. The MSDS and product web site are linked now as well.Wiredrabbit (talk) 09:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In popular culture

We could expand the parody section renaming it another way adding other places it is mentioned, like Blondie's 70s song "Rip Her To Shreds" where they sing "She looks like she washes with Comet". UndDerMarlena (talk) 21:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I think the parody section is terribly unencyclopedic already and should either be sourced and cited correctly or eliminated. I vote eliminate. Not a bit of the information in it is remotely approaching in either notability or importance. Add the lack of sourcing and it should be nuked simply because it offers zero worthwhile information. Keep in mind I used to sing the stupid grade school songs and thought they were funny and still do, so this isn't about being overly opinionated. I just think it's silliness that doesn't belong here. Any objections? SentientParadox (talk) 01:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also vote eliminate the Parody section. iamdumdum (talk) 11:53, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Comet (cleanser). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150417063942/http://www.pgpro.ca/media/202411/pgp_comet_deoderizing_cleanser_with_chlorinol_en.pdf to http://www.pgpro.ca/media/202411/pgp_comet_deoderizing_cleanser_with_chlorinol_en.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]