Jump to content

Talk:Come to the Well

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCome to the Well has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starCome to the Well is part of the Casting Crowns studio albums series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 15, 2012Good article nomineeListed
February 4, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 2, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that CCM singer Matthew West co-wrote half of the tracks on the Casting Crowns's album Come to the Well?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Come to the Well/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 01:39, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review discussion

[edit]

I am starting to review this article. North8000 (talk) 01:39, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am passing this article. I have one comment in an area which is not a GA criteria. The layout of this article is unusual and not pretty due to the large amount of "blocks" in proportion to text. In some cases they are on both the left and right side with the text sandwiched in between. In addition to the two images (not in question) there is a large amount of "listen" blocks, table and list blocks in proportion to the text. On idea might to turn some of them into text or to display them in smaller or more compact forms/sizes. Congratulations on creating an excellent article! North8000 (talk) 02:41, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Final GA review checklist

[edit]

Well-written

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 02:31, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Factually accurate and verifiable

Meets this criteria North8000 (talk) 02:31, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Broad in its coverage

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 02:32, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

Meets this criteria. Not a prevalent topic here except for reviews, and its coverage is neutral.

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

Meets this criteria. No stability issues. North8000 (talk) 02:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by images

Meets this criteria. Has two images. The one non-free has an article-specific use rationale. North8000 (talk) 01:46, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passes Good Article!

[edit]

I am passing this for Good article. "Duplicating" this mention here for when the review is no longer transcluded to the talk page. Congratulations! Nice work! North8000 (talk) 02:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]