Talk:Come Back to Me (Vanessa Hudgens song)
Come Back to Me (Vanessa Hudgens song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1st single From Vanessa Anne Hudgens' Upcoming Album V. the song's Video Will Premiere during The Cheetah Girls 2:When In Spain on August 25th,2006
Lyrics
[edit]Well, I posted the lyrics to this song, and I didn't know how to make it look nice. The first time I tried to do it, it came out all on like the same line, so I put spaces in it. If someone knows how to make look better, feel free to fix it. But those are the lyrics pretty much word for word.
Ok, and wtf? The lyrics weren't even posted for 30 seconds and the Admins came and deleted them? WTF is up with that? And I get a warning for spamming? I'm sorry but I don't see how posting lyrics to the song within the songs own wiki page settles as spamming.
its a copyright violation the Lyrics are copyrighted. as per wikipedia policy that must be removed Betacommand
Attn: 'Love maybe', 'Love may be', 'Love, baby.' or 'Love Baby. Which is the right lyric in the chorus ? Is anybody listening ?
I think it's "love maybe"... I DON'T KNOW thats how it sounds to me.Atomic45 06:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Love Baby, come back. 82.25.180.130 21:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Vanessa Hudgens - Come Back To Me 2.jpg
[edit]Image:Vanessa Hudgens - Come Back To Me 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Vanessa Hudgens - Come Back To Me 3.jpg
[edit]Image:Vanessa Hudgens - Come Back To Me 3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Lyrics
[edit]This song played backwards has lyrics related to sex...you may want to put that there Npurplegirl (talk) 01:09, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Come Back to Me (Vanessa Hudgens song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: AJona1992 (talk · contribs) 19:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Infobox
- Everything is good
- Media
- Everything is good
- GAN reports
- According to this report there are a few WP:DABLINKs, please fix.
- Lead
- There are too many sentences that have "the song" - needs a variety
- Background and composition
- Critical reception
- Chart performance
- Too many sentences with "the song" - needs a variety
- "on the now defunct Pop 100" - is redundant, we don't need to know that it is defunct.
- "The song also reached" - or did it peaked?
- Music video and live performances
- In the last scene, she is sings and dances in front of a colorful background. - needs fixing
- Reference and sourcing checking
- What makes this a reliable source? This?, This?, This?
- Everything else looks good. Please fix all of these concerns, Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 00:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- I think it's all done now. Pancake (talk) 14:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
You are still arguing on Amazon after all that happened on the Britney son's review page? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- Jona, have you abandoned this review? Pancake (talk) 16:48, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry forgive me I will do a second review this weekend. Best, Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 17:12, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Come Back to Me (Vanessa Hudgens song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6HkD4d8lG?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fmqb.com%2FArticle.asp%3Fid%3D69239 to http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=69239
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Music good articles
- GA-Class Pop music articles
- Low-importance Pop music articles
- Pop music articles
- GA-Class R&B and Soul Music articles
- Low-importance R&B and Soul Music articles
- WikiProject R&B and Soul Music articles
- GA-Class song articles
- GA-Class Women in music articles
- Low-importance Women in music articles
- WikiProject Women in Music articles