Jump to content

Talk:Combust (astrological aspect)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Proposed merge into Heliacal rising

[edit]

With all due respect to those interested in astrology or astronomy, this article is about a highly technical, arcane and estoric subject. I am strongly in favor of merging it into Heliacal rising, which is much more understandable, or else deleting this article entirely. - mbeychok 21:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Combust is not the same as heliacal rising -- heliacal rising deals with a planet's position on the horizon (more specifically a rising planet's/star's position on the eastern horizon), while combust deals with a planet's position in close conjunction with the Sun (irregardless of the horizon). I hope this clears things up for you. --172.162.216.137 13:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article does not present the mainstream astrological definition and usage of combust.

Merger Proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge MakeSense64 (talk) 07:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that Cazimi_(astrological_aspect) be merged into Combust_(astrological_aspect). Both topics are closely related and after merging the other long term issues with both articles can be solved. MakeSense64 (talk) 07:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cazimi is a phase within combustion so its discussion can be merged within the discussion of combustion yes.Clooneymark (talk) 13:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

More improvement needed

[edit]

Have added a search box. Need more sources. MakeSense64 (talk) 08:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]