Talk:Combined Communications-Electronics Board

Military history: South Pacific / British / Canadian / European / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	British military history task force
	Canadian military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Combined Communications Electronics Board. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Content with extensive references deleted

@Cceb perm sec:, in your last edit, you deleted an entire table, where every single row had a citation which linked to a document supporting its existence, name, and often other details. Can you please tell me which parts of that table are incorrect? Because I'm using all of those sources to develop better civilian two-way radio procedures, it's particularly important to know where any errors are, so that I don't promulgate them into other locations.PetesGuide (talk) (K6WEB) 17:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CCEB Public Site

The official site link, in the external links section, leads to a redirect page at the All Partners Access Network, which indicates CCEB has moved. The redirect lands at a sign in page. The International Standardization Documents page at the United States Department of Defense's Defense Standardization Program website has a link to a "CCEB Public Site" with the same URL as the redirect landing page. Has anyone attempted creation of an account in order to determine if the site is still public but now requires registration? Squideshi (talk) 05:38, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]