Talk:Colossal carbon tube

Recent references?

If anyone is watching this page and may have more recent information on CCT, could you please identify sources for such? I can not find anything more recent than the references to the original article, which is 2 years old.I am concerned that this might have been a hoax, a premature publication, or may have been subsequently classified.

Aqm2241 (talk) 04:28, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't imagine it being a hoax, given that the original discovery was published in Physical Review Letters, which has a great reputation for peer reviewing and fact checking, and the authors have published a lot of material relating to things like carbon nanotubes and graphene in prestigious journals. There was a 2001 paper presented at a conference in 2011 (abstract here that references CCTs in the context of a space elevator design. According to this, the paper had at least some sort of peer review. But it is puzzling that nobody has published any follow-up work on this technology, or filed patent applications. It doesn't make sense that further work is classified, given that if the U.S. government wanted to keep it as a classified Department of Energy project, it could have prevented its publication in the first place. And the U.S. government could not stop other researchers from doing follow-up work based on the published article. My guess is it's an issue of funding.COGDEN 23:50, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another 7 years later: Nothing new?--Eheran (talk) 09:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good bet that it’s garbage, Phys. Rev. or not.81.33.183.45 (talk) 19:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colossal carbon tube.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Colossal carbon tube.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:19, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]