Talk:Colorimetric analysis

Chemistry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Part of this article was formerly at Color reaction. Biscuittin (talk) 12:11, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simplification

I have simplified the chemical reactions (e.g. by leaving out oxidation states) to make them more accessible to non-scientists. Have I overdone the simplification? Biscuittin (talk) 07:59, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cuvettes are "required equipment"?

Plenty of colormetric assays that use 96-well format (not cuvettes), and even in the article, itself, it says an autoanalyzer can be used, but I believe those use a "flowcell", and not a cuvette, either. I don't know enough about the technical to change this, myself (is a 'flowcell' a TYPE of cuvette?- perhaps... I would definitely argue that a well is not a cuvette, but that's just my understanding, I don't speak for all industry). Humble appologies if I should have just changed it, myself... 23.24.214.46 (talk) 19:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]