Talk:Colleges of the University of Santo Tomas

Colleges of the University of Santo Tomas was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 11, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Colleges of the University of Santo Tomas/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 18:43, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article has grammatical, spelling etc. issues. Request for copyedit at WP:GOCE.
Multiple MoS issues. Some words in "Types of college" are in bold unnecessarily. Citations aren't formatted properly
Try to avoid single line paras WP:PARA
Lack of references. Many parts are unsourced. "Types of college" section, the whole "Roll call" section do not have any citations. ("Various faculties on...", "College of Science retained...", "The Alfredo M. Velayo College of Accountancy became...", "In university events, like..." all unsourced)
"are considered to be ..." - considered by whom?
Some info mentioned in the lead, not mentioned in body. Lead is the summary of everything in the body. Also, no need to add citations in lead as per WP:CITELEAD
Add some more prose to the article. As of now, its mainly based on the table and the year-wise chart
If available, add some images
Overall the article has comprehensiveness issue.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 06:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]