Talk:College of Psychologists of Ontario

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on College of Psychologists of Ontario. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:32, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the links on this page are AFU

the links on this page are bizarre "showcontent"? and go nowhere. Great work. 107.3.134.101 (talk) 20:19, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Peterson

There is no reason to have a section on Jordan Peterson who is a rank and file member of the CPO and doesn't even practice. I suggest we reduce it to a single line and people who are interested can go to the article about Peterson. TFD (talk) 11:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Against - The decision has garnered the regulatory body a ridiculous amount of media attention both domestically and internationally. It’s absolutely relevant to the article. 204.237.2.18 (talk) 15:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's worth mentioning but it is a relatively minor detail of the College's history. That might have been different had Peterson won his challenge. Readers wanting to know more about the College are not interested in Peterson's ill-founded claims about them.

The best place to cover the story in detail is in Peterson's own article where it fits in with his long list of controversies. TFD (talk) 04:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]