Talk:College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please cease deleting the truth about this College.

The doctors it has unfairly attacked over the years have been vindicated.

I find the quoted body of text confusing because it mixes quotes and italics. By the end of reading a long sentence in italics I've forgetten it's a quote and start thinking it's integrated into the main text of the especially small article. Without strongly isolating the "he saids" and "she saids" it borders on feeling like a violation of the neutral point of view policy of Wikipedia. I hope the original author can come back here and rewrite it as per the advice NPOV tutorial, because I'll forget to come back. I tried to find a relevant example in there for the poster, Accusations is the closest I can find. Nastajus 13:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

End of the College

Please explain why you have removed the section, "End of the College". It is completely accurate and from a neutral point of view. Are you a defender of the College?

Jerry Green, M.D.

Revert of "END OF COLLEGE"

I think a section criticism of the college could be created. The edits I reverted -- while addressing the issue need to be referenced (see WP:REF) and written from a neutral point of view (see WP:NPOV). Nephron T|C 08:05, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Significant changes

I've endevoured to NPOV the article. I think some criticism could be directed at the CPSO about alternative medicine; however, I don't think the reference that was there added anything nor did the section really explain the CPSO policy, i.e. the criticism was poorly direct and, IMHO, not well-informed. Nephron T|C 18:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits by CPSO associated IP addresses, User:Jhefley

There have been several edits by CPSO related addresses:

The latest was by IP 38.99.144.50.
- http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/38.99.141.50 returns: Hostname: webmail.cpso.on.ca.

Previously the CPSO page was edited by IP 38.99.158.114.
- http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/38.99.158.114 returns: Hostname: cpso.on.ca.

User:Jhefley may represent someone at the CPSO, judging by the pattern of edits and especially so as one of their edits shortly follows one by IP 38.99.141.50 and completes the blanking of the "criticisms" section.

JHefley is an employee of the CPSO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.150.72.125 (talk) 02:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nephron T|C 04:52, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted again. I wonder if jhefley is Jill Hefley Associate Director Policy and Communications at the CPSO.[1] Nephron T|C 04:58, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]