Talk:College Magazine

New Changes

Hi Wikipedia Team,

I made quite a few changes to the post and I wanted to see if we've met your quality standards. Please let me know if there is anything else we need to add to move this page beyond Start-Class.

Thanks, Cmeditorial (talk) 16:29, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Amanda

Cmeditorial, please create individual accounts for each person editing Wikipedia, as Amatulić notes below - thank you. –SJ+ 08:31, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Who is "we"? Accounts should represent only you, not an organization.

No, this article doesn't meet the WP:N threshold for inclusion. Proposing for deletion. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello, why are we so harsh to newbies? This user at least took the time to work through Articles for Creation. It seems to me that any publication with a reach of 200k (or even 120k as the article first stated) is at least borderline notable and deserving of a deletion discussion. Speedying an article that is clearly not spam and written by someone asking so nicely for assistance just seems mean. –SJ+ 08:31, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Undeletion

This was speedied with the comment‎ "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: Article fails WP:N criteria for inclusion. Sources all primary sources. Author confirmed COI."

I've undeleted on the grounds that the regular requests for assistance from editors mean this is not unambiguous advertising; a number of sources are not primary (though one can argue their notability), and the author's relation to the subject was clear and not sneaky - they made a point of getting input from other wikipedians before posting this in article space. If you feel this should be deleted, please start a deletion discussion. (Personally, I would rather wait for the original author to comment on whether there are better third-party news or other sources discussing the 'zine; a reach of 200,000 at 14 campuses, if accurate, would certainly be significant.) –SJ+ 09:19, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on College Magazine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110310130835/http://www.collegemagazine.com/content/contributing-college-magazine-101 to http://www.collegemagazine.com/content/contributing-college-magazine-101

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)