A fact from Colleen Cavanaugh appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 August 2008, and was viewed approximately 911 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
All of the poor sourcing and poor source formatting, leading this to be a near fully dead-linked article, were a part of its original structure from its original editing session. Besides calling attention to the current poor state of affairs, here, I further call attention to the general issue of article stubs being accepted without adequate or proper sourcing. Le Prof 73.211.138.148 (talk) 16:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Much of the dead sourcing has been addressed, but the bare URLs and a couple dead links remain. Note, the Cromie, Harvard Gazette source is not independent, and needs to be balanced, and the Kunzig (2000) book is independent, but remains underused in this article. Le Prof 20:18, 12 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.211.138.148 (talk)
.jpg){kind=small}