Talk:Collector v. Day

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Anyone have any suggestions on how to make this article better? User: I miss the sun

Also, how do you put an organized graph (like the ones on other Case Law articles) to be placed on the right of the text? User: I miss the sun

I've added an infobox (if that's what you meant). Please see Template:Infobox SCOTUS case for more details on the parameters. Gabbe (talk) 23:16, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I miss the sun (talk) 19:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One question that I cannot get off my mind that we have been discussing in one of my classes - is collective knowledge more effective than expert knowledge, essentially why is it that Wikipedia favors the facts from the people over individual experts? Isn't it true that for most subjects (especially Collector v. Day), the people get their information from books, articles, history channels, other TV programs that are filled with experts who give us that knowledge? This is something that has been on my mind and if anyone can contribute an opinion, thatd be great. I miss the sun (talk) 19:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]