Jump to content

Talk:Collectivity of Saint Martin/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:StMartinCoat.png

Image:StMartinCoat.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Area code

What's the area code for this half of the island? Add it to the info box. Zurqoxn (talk) 15:27, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

"France"

Does the separation of Saint-Martin and Saint-Barthélemy from Guadeloupe (on February 22, 2007) mean that France has gotten smaller? Have its population and land area been reduced accordingly? Backspace 19:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

No, both still remain part of France (as overseas collectivities). The number of inhabitants (French population) has not been reduced, but the French Parliament got two new representatives! mx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.143.85.193 (talk) 21:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Daylight Saving Time?

According to the infobox, Saint Martin observes daylight saving time. I seriously doubt whether that is correct.Skysmurf (talk) 09:07, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:36, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Saint Martin (France) → Collectivity of Saint Martin — Avoids the need for the less natural "(France)" disambiguator suffix. Cybercobra (talk) 04:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Collectivity of Saint Martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:30, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Collectivity of Saint Martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Correct emblem??

Is the emblem shown the correct one? The French wiki shows a different version. Sdrawkcab (talk) 18:52, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 19 February 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 22:08, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

– The proposed article titles make it clear which side of the island it is talking about. Since both of those titles translate to Saint Martin in English. Interstellarity (talk) 20:04, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

  • Oppose moving Sint Maarten. Sint Maarten only means the Dutch side of the island. It doesn't matter if it is translated to Saint Martin in English, because sources refer to it by its Dutch name [1]. Also, "Sint Maarten (Netherlands)" makes it look like there's another article titled "Sint Maarten" in Wikipedia which makes disambiguation necessary, but that's not the case. No comment on the proposed move of the French side of the island. Super Ψ Dro 12:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Strongly oppose moving Sint Maarten to Sint Maarten (Netherlands). My main concern here is that Sint Maarten is a constituent country of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and thus not a part of the Netherlands itself. While "Netherlands" is also the short name for the Kingdom, putting it in parentheses behind the country's name does not do its autonomous constitutional status justice. It's like changing Saint Lucia to Saint Lucia (United Kingdom). In addition, Sint Maarten (Netherlands) would cause confusion with Sint Maarten, Netherlands. There is also no need for disambiguation, since the spelling is different from Saint Martin. — Ætoms [talk] 12:56, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
    You can’t compare this article to Saint Lucia since it is an independent country. This place is a dependent territory of the Netherlands. Interstellarity (talk) 14:13, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
    I agree that the cases are not 100% identical, but what I am trying to say is that Sint Maarten and the Netherlands are formally equal to each other. Sint Maarten is only dependent on the Netherlands when it comes to foreign policy, but other than that has its own government that is completely independent from the Dutch government. They basically only share the same monarch (just like Saint Lucia and the United Kingdom). — Ætoms [talk] 14:45, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Strongly oppose: agreed with reasoning by User:Ætoms. I don't believe there's any confusion about which side of the island is being referred to by the existing titles, and certainly within reading the lede sentences of each article. I feel this proposal comes from a sense of hierarchical organization, and attempts to impose a sense of symmetry on the two parts of the island ((based solely on their national ties), that aren't equivalent (one is a territory, the other is a country). On the French side, there are several French locales that simply "Saint Martin (France)" could be confused with. The current title is unique and requires no disambiguation. On the Dutch side, this would be akin to moving Northern Ireland to Northern Ireland (United Kingdom). It's not necessary.  — sbb (talk) 15:33, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
@Sbb: I don’t think Northern Ireland is a good example. The reason it’s not moved to that title is because it doesn’t need disambiguation and is without a doubt the primary topic. This should be moved because there are other Saint Martins in the world like the French side and the whole island. Interstellarity (talk) 18:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Oppose: I think it's unnecessary. Does that mean island of Saba would then need to become "Saba (Netherlands)"?
  • Oppose. While I'm not sure about the title of the French one, there are too many other Saint-Martins in France for the proposed title to be a good one. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Oppose. While there is marginal value to having both sides of this wonderful island in the same format (stating the upside first), it does not nearly cancel out the huge costs in terms of what what we'd be giving up on:
Both names would become unnecessary cluttered with dabs versus the current much better situation of WP:NATURAL.
The Dutch side of Sint Maarten is WP:PRIMARYWP:PRIMARYTOPIC and there's insufficient reason to give that up.
While the fairy tale of federalism of the Kingdom of the Netherlands should be taken with more than just a grain of salt (kudos to the nominator if he consciously did!), it is easy to conclude from the reactions above how we would open a new, this time totally unnecessary, front with those apt to accept government decisions and statements at face value. gidonb (talk) 15:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
I presume you meant that the Dutch side of Sint Maarten is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, rather than WP:PRIMARY? =)  — sbb (talk) 16:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
sbb, fixed. Thank you! gidonb (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
For my other proposal on this very topic, see here. gidonb (talk) 20:44, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Collectivity_of_Saint_Martin/Archive_1&oldid=1155659214"