Talk:Collective Security Treaty Organization

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Russia: Military / Politics and law High‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.
	This article is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force.

Central Asia Mid‑importance

	Asia portal Collective Security Treaty Organization is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

CSTO symbol

Does any information exist about the creation of the CSTO symbol? It looks familiar to NATO's (Image:Flag of NATO.svg): four arrows each pointed to one of the four directions, in a circle. Was this intended or coincidal? Sijo Ripa 13:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I may be digging here, but I would assume the four sides represent north south east west and their resolve to aid everyone everywhere.

-G —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.231.228.17 (talk) 01:01, August 22, 2007 (UTC) i looked around a little bit, and it seems to resemble a mix between the Commonwealth of Independent States logo, and the nato one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manumaker08 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving

The spelling has been rectified because the Organisation is in Eurasia and ought to be called after the only official form of English in Eurasia - the British English. This page should serve only as redirecting. Bogorm (talk) 12:06, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

legend of map

The legend of map categorizes Azerbaijan and Georgia as "observers". Is this correct? The article itself limits their status to "former members", therefore I doubt them to enjoy the official status of "observers" at present. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.60.136.77 (talk) 15:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Heracletus (talk) 14:13, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Map

Currently maps in this article and elsewhere show Taiwan as part of the CSTO. Chinese claims notwithstanding, is this accurate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.172.143.205 (talk) 04:12, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. Sakhalin is not Taiwan... Heracletus (talk) 14:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Map needs to be updated to reflect the Uzbekistan withdrawal. Doyna Yar (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Title is mispelled

Its orginization, not orginisation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.54.48.198 (talk) 13:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Founded when?

"The Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO; Russian: Организация Договора о Коллективной Безопасности) is an intergovernmental military alliance which was signed on 15 May 1992. On 7 October 2002, the Presidents of Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia and Tajikistan signed a charter in Tashkent founding the CSTO."

So if it was signed in 1992 then how on earth was it founded in 2002? Maybe it was proposed in 1992? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.145.251.34 (talk) 19:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the above comment, the treaty was signed in 1992, the Organization was created by UN Charter in 2002. (http://www.odkb.gov.ru/start/index_aengl.htm)

Further, the text of the United Nations Charter states that the Charter was "Done at Chisinau on 7 October 2002." Chisinau is in Moldova. The opening statement of this article, as we can see, states that the Charter was signing in Tashkent.

82.1.33.91 (talk) 12:36, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

the wrong map

The wrong map of Russia. The Kuril islands are not painted in green. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.140.211.132 (talk) 08:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

India membership

Since CSTO is planning to extend outside FSU by including Iran, is there any information about India? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.10.132.228 (talk) 06:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Collective Security Treaty Organization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Collective Security Treaty Organization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Collective Security Treaty Organization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140201214505/http://www.kommersant.com/p812422/CIS_CSTO_Russia_Lebedev/ to http://www.kommersant.com/p812422/CIS_CSTO_Russia_Lebedev/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uzbekistan membership

Since Uzbekistan did not prolong its membership, should "Uzbekistan has yet to sign" be removed from the Collective Rapid Reaction Force section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.87.147.192 (talk) 09:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No country was attacking Kazakhstan so why they went to aid the government against protestors? just to find a reason to kill innocent civilians? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:14C:23C:5000:8C70:8FDF:3D69:C432 (talk) 20:38, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FORUM HammerFilmFan (talk) 18:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article 4?

Article 4 similar to NATO article 5? Not according to the linked charter text. There article 3 has that text. However, that linked text clashes with the Basic Facts in the linked English version of the CSTO site. WTF? Can someone make any sense of this? 84.250.167.255 (talk) 12:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History: Armenian-Azeri conflict

Dear Knižnik, if you think I forgot to add something important from the article or if you are unhappy with the wording, feel free to change it up a bit, but there is no need to bascially repeat the same statement... ΙℭaℜuΣatthe☼ (talk). 18:44, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just wanted to highlight that the Armenian leadership had mad several calls for an CSTO intervention which were rebuffed, I think it was not clear in your para.--Knižnik (talk) 09:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Secretary General Listed

The guy from Kazakhstan is no longer the Secretary General. An UPDATE is needed here! 32.219.12.81 (talk) 12:24, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 February 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Closed a little early considering the overwhelming opposition below.(non-admin closure) Estar8806 (talk) 02:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Collective Security Treaty Organization → CSTO – There aren't really any articles on Wikipedia that "CSTO" stands for except this article. Plus, there is not even a disambiguation page of "CSTO", as shown with "CSTO (disambiguation)". Also, as shown by this Ngram, "CSTO" clearly supersedes "Collective Security Treaty Organization". As such, I believe this move would be a good move. How says everyone? Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 02:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 06:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Skeptical~~ Weak oppose: Ngram is not the right way to evaluate this. Many sources probably introduce the full spelled-out term and then use the abbreviation repeatedly after they have explained it. In an Ngram analysis, this would result in many more uses of the abbreviated term than the full name, but does not indicate that "readers somewhat familiar with the subject are likely to only recognise the name by its acronym" (a quote from MOS:ACROTITLE). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 18:22, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also skeptical. WP:RECOGNIZABILITY is most important in WP:CRITERIAORDER, and the abbreviation is probably opaque to most readers, while the full name gives some hints to the nature of the subject. We don’t have main articles titled UN, EU, CAREC, CAU, CIS, EEU, ECO, SCO, OTS, although we do have ASEAN, NATO, and TAKM. —Michael Z. 21:40, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Shifted from 'skeptical' to 'Weak oppose' following the comments of Michael Z. When in doubt, Wikipedia should have a formal tone and possibly unfamiliar names should be spelled out. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:56, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Eh... While it is occasionally exclusively referred to as the CSTO in the same vein as NATO, I concur that ngrams is not the best measure of this and the CSTO isn't as well known as NATO, making the initialism opaque. ^Clyde!_Franklin! 20:40, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose clarity. WP:CRITERIA In ictu oculi (talk) 11:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:NATDAB --- Tbf69 P • T 19:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

armenia

if armenia officially left then shouldnt the map be updated 2603:6011:9600:52C0:71B8:DC9A:E9E2:40E0 (talk) 13:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read the notes, they didn't officially leave. Archives908 (talk) 13:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]