This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
Each brand doesn't have it's own page?? (Some of them do.) Considering how big some of these brands are or have been in the past, it's surprising that some of them don't have their own page. If they were merged, which I doubt, we should have more info on this page, however, this page is barely just a stub. I'm here because I was looking for info on Airwalk. Centerone (talk) 23:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The company was acquired back in 2012 but not sure if the name was kept as a subsidiary or if the brands were simply absorbed and the company disbanded. I do see that many of the brands do have pages. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is also the issue that Collective Brands, Inc. redirects to Payless ShoeSource, but Collective Brands has its own page, which is a bit... stubby. Tracking down some of the information about the holdings is really hard, between Collective Brands, Collective Licensing, and Payless--especially since the SEC filings and other PR sources only make a call to the NYSE ticker of PSS.
I suggest either beefing up this page or merging this with the Payless page, since the company is currently structured under "Payless Holdings" as owned by the three groups listed on that page.
Sdpg33 (talk) 02:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]