Talk:Collections management system

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Collections Care (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Collections Care, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Collections CareWikipedia:WikiProject Collections CareTemplate:WikiProject Collections CareCollections Care articles

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment.

Reviews on Collections management system article

Hi Ed! I am really excited to see your page come together; it sure looks like you've put a lot of thought into it thus far. Collection management systems is quite a large topic to cover, but I think that your outline sensibly breaks it down into topics that flow right into the next topic. On one of your headers you mention public access, and I am curious what this will address... I am also wondering if access within the museum is something that you might want to address as well, such as which departments or individuals within a museum would have access to what functions of a collections management system, and who has access to add or change data. I am also wondering if you will address that variations of CMSs across different types of museums. Overall, I think you have a great outline for your project! Good luck! Ash gray04 (talk) 16:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ed, this article appears to be on its way to a very good start. I think that the resources that you have listed cover an excellent range among institution sizes and how to choose a proper system. From what I know about Collection Management you hit all the major resources. Your structure seems appropriate and within the desire framework of Wikipedia. Your range of descriptions is all encompassing and beyond my view of need for correction. At this point, I thought it would be interesting if you would write on how to choose a system, even if in a short list of considerations (collections size, funding, etc.). I don't think it would take much effort and it may help the lay individual who is just taking a quick browse. Well done and good luck going forward. Jrflipski (talk) 01:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC) Jrflipski (talk)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Collections management system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141219041630/http://conservationspace.org/Home.html to http://www.conservationspace.org/Home.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]