Talk:Collared brown lemur/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 21:50, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Had a decent read through of the article, prose quality is good and engaging.

• A line needs to be added to the lead paragraph to summarise the Conversation status section. All other sections already have a mention.

• "the Collared Brown Lemur was promoted to full species status in 2001" - by who?

• I appreciate that information is limited, but is there any information on natural predators?

Overall a very nice job on a species where information is not readily available. Miyagawa (talk) 21:50, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the comments. I have fixed the first 2 issues, and after reviewing the newer lemur books I have recently acquired, as well as searching the literature on Google Scholar, I have not been able to find anything specific to this species. I guess I could mention general lemur predators, but otherwise this apparently has not been studied in this species. – VisionHolder « talk » 00:49, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

No problem, if the information isn't available, then it isn't available.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Good job with the article. :) Miyagawa (talk) 21:16, 13 March 2010 (UTC)