Talk:Colegio de la Preciosa Sangre de Pichilemu/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 23:26, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am starting a review of this article. North8000 (talk) 23:26, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did a pre-review question/post at on the talk page of the nominator and primary editor. [1] As of today have not received a response and it appears that they may be retired. (?) North8000 (talk) 23:30, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably best to fail it post-review, since the last edit by the user was in October. You can wait to see if another user will pick it up, but that's unlikely. Wizardman 02:33, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review discussion

In the academics section, the statement "The school is "the best in Pichilemu"" really needs to be sourced (if kept) . One its is a superlative claim, and the other that it is put in as a quote. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 00:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is a direct quote from the Expreso de la Costa newspaper. I've introduced the sentence expressing it is a quote from that news source. The issue is sourcing. Can you provide a source for that? (e.g. the Expreso de la Costa article.)?

Got it, reference added.

Resolved. North8000 (talk) 21:18, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just re-remembered that it it also in the lead as a pretty broad statement. I may tweak it. North8000 (talk) 11:18, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article has a lot of info that is overly detailed / not enclyclopedic, some it student-guide or student news type material. Just looking for a bit of a reduction. I prefer to not get into picking individual sentences, but listing the 2011 debate team topic, the hours of operation (and exceptions to them) give the idea of what I'm thinking about. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 00:15, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know it is overly detailed at times. Just for the record, I based this article off of other good articles on schools, such as Benet Academy and École L'Odyssée (which is also a foreign-language school). Please consider too that being this a small-town school, there weren't too many references to put to it, besides some which are kind of repetitive. Regards, --Lester Foster (talk | talk) 20:34, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I might just make a few small pares and then figure we're good enough in that respect. When I edit, I'm an editor, not a reviewer. Feel free to revert if you disagree. North8000 (talk) 20:55, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay!

Resolved. Not perfect in that area, but OK enough to not impact passing GA. North8000 (talk) 21:11, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you, with the first use of the term in the article, briefly explain what the "PSU" test is? Thanx. North8000 (talk) 21:00, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lester Foster (talk | talk) 21:05, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved. North8000 (talk) 21:17, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

Well-written

Meets this criteria. See closing note.North8000 (talk) 11:53, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Factually accurate and verifiable

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 11:52, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Broad in its coverage

Meets this criteria.North8000 (talk) 11:52, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

Sufficiently meets this criteria. See closing note. North8000 (talk) 11:50, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 11:24, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by images

Passes this criteria. Has 4 images, all are free so article-specific use-rationale is not required. North8000 (talk) 23:56, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, this article passes as a Good Article! As noted, it could possibly use a bit more paring on some very detailed information contained, but this is a minor suggestion, not a GA passage issue. The level of detail that made it in regarding accomplishments might give it tiny-bit-POV appearance, but such actually comes from the nature of coverage in sources. Again, congratulations!...I will implement the details. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 12:01, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]