Talk:Cody Ko/GA1

GA Review

not within reach of GA status at the moment, but a concerted effort could definitely turn that around theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Theleekycauldron (talk · contribs) 22:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I think this GAN is going to come out to a quickfail, for two main reasons. First, the article has a maintenance tag for advert-related content, which is not invalid, but I can see you've taken a lot of steps in the right direction. Second, this article is still a long way from meeting the reliable sourcing and due weight requirements – I generally don't consider Tubefilter to be more than a marginally reliable source that can be used for maybe routine facts and interviews. I'm also seeing a school newspaper, Newsweek, and other sources that really don't have due weight for facts in a BLP. For those two reasons, I think the article isn't really within spitting distance of GA status, but I encourage you to resubmit when the tag is off and the questionable sourcing's been whittled out :)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.