Talk:Codman Carriage House and Stable/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kieran207 (talk · contribs) 22:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I will be reviewing this article. I plan on this review taking 1-3 days for me. Thanks---Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 22:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- ALSO:Unless otherwise stated, a Pass within the section denotes a passing of that specific criteria, not the full passing of the article.--Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 23:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Well Written
[edit]- The article is well written, Compliant with WP:MOS and is very concise. I give this category a Pass.
Verifiable with no Original Research
[edit]- A thorough look at the reference list shows zero WP:SPS, so that's good. All information presented in the prose is in fact verified by a WP:RS. No original research was seen in the article. No plagiarism as far as I can see. Quotes are attributed, everything is cited, I give this category a Pass.
Broad in it's coverage
[edit]The main aspects of the topic are properly adressed. It stays focused while giving a good amount of detail (Although not an innapropiate amount per the summary style). I give this category a Pass
Neutral
[edit]Due weight is given, no bias seen, Pass.
Stable
[edit]No edit warring or massive changes seen recently. The edit history does show some minor vandalism but it has been swiftly reverted. Pass.
Illustrated
[edit]Pictures of the building are shown where necessary. Properly illustrated, Pass.
Well good job! The article has passed, I will be closing this review shortly.--Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 23:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Awesome, thank you very much. APK whisper in my ear 21:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)