Talk:Cocktails (The Office)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 23:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article soon.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
LEAD, no summary or mention of production

Also, no need to cite something in the lead if you cite it else where in the article, so you can remove citation No. 1

I would add the Episode citation after the guest stars on the infobox, right after the last one

"Roy brings his brother, who "took a bath" selling their jet skis." What does this mean? He took a bath after selling the skis? Or he took a bath while selling them?
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
OK, OfficeTally is citing an official NBC document, but it is a fan cite. Might I suggest you cite the actual NBC press release? Here is a template for a press release, the only thing that isn't there is the url, which seems to be broken. (Just because I'm nice, the citation template would look like: {{cite press release |title=Feb. 27, 2007 Press Release ("Cocktails")| archiveurl =http://www.officetally.com/the-office-nielsen-ratings/2| archivedate =10 October 2008|url= http://www.nbcumv.com/release_detail.nbc/entertainment-20070227000000-nbcratingsresults.html|publisher=NBC|date=27 February 2007|accessdate=23 January 2012-01}})
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Thorough coverage, no sign of trivia
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Neural POV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
No edit warring
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Two pictures, properly tagged. All good
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the review. I believe I addressed all of your comments (let me know if adding the ref to the infobox guest stars is what you meant). Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 02:40, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I love The Office. Yeah, that's what I meant! Congrats! I pass the article!--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 16:34, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]