Talk:Cochlear Limited
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
neutral point of view + copyright
[edit]I tagged the article ; whereas the "controversy" section provides a counterbalance, the whole "History" section is just repeating http://www.cochlear.com/au/corporate/about-graeme-clark --MarmotteiNoZ 05:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
[edit]Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cochlear.com/corporate/about-graeme-clark. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:41, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Company Formation
[edit]Is it appropriate to add some information relating to the formation of the company here. For example stating what led to the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia to fund the research work that led to the commercially available products sold today and what payback resulted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brycewhite (talk • contribs) 02:30, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Logo
[edit]@HyRax Aus: I'd say until they update their website or we see updated packaging or updated logo on their building, stick with the current website logo. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 00:54, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: They are already using updated packaging. The logo on the building in Australia won't change for ages because of COVID (not an appropriate spend of money), however the new Denver Office sports the new logo, and Cochlear's LinkedIn page sports the new branding as well. — HyRax Aus (talk or ping me) 01:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Photo gallery
[edit]Lots and lots of articles about electronics-related subjects (heck, just look at the article about hearing aids) contain a multitude of pictures to show the evolution of older versions of electronics in comparison to newer devices. I have tried via social media to source usable (ie, freely licensed) photos of various speech processor models, old, older, and newer that Wikimedia doesn't have good photos of. However, it appears that a sole user (MrOllie) has some very strong opinions against the inclusion of such images, seeing them as out of scope and "decorative". I highly encourage other users that pay attention to this article to voice their opinions here (after all I highly doubt Mr.Ollie's staunch anti-mini-photo-gallery stance is anywhere near the community consensus as a whole, especially given how incredibly common in electronics articles it is to provide a plethora of photos of devices, especially obsolete/discontinued ones to show how something changes with time).--RespectCE (talk) 17:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Company founded edit request
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Please change "Founded 1983" to "Founded 1981"
Please change "Based in Sydney, Cochlear was formed in 1983 as a subsidiary of Nucleus" to "Based in Sydney, Cochlear was formed in 1981 as a subsidiary of Nucleus"
Please change "Cochlear was originally founded in 1983 as a subsidiary of Nucleus" to "Cochlear was originally founded in 1981 as a subsidiary of Nucleus"
Please change "Cochlear Corporation was established in Australia in 1983" to "Cochlear Corporation was established in Australia in 1981"
Source is 2023 annual report: https://assets.cochlear.com/api/public/content/db4f441469aa4263acccdfc23980d21b?v=ce8bbd15 Luigiruoppo (talk) 04:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC)