Talk:Coccomyces dentatus/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 11:44, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments

-

"Coccomyces dentatus is one of only two species are known with both a spermatial". I'd recomment changing "are known with" to "kown to have". "are known with" makes no grammatical sense to me.
"looaklike" I guess you meant "lookalike".

All sources are reliable from a first look and I shall assume good faith since I can only understand english, spanish and portuguese and hardly domain french and italian. Structure and formatting of references is up to standard, specifically high so no concerns here.

Very broad and specific. This article not only covers the main aspects but takes them into great and helpful detail.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Thanks kindly for the review, Hahc21. I've fixed the prose issues you mentioned above. Anything else? Sasata (talk) 17:48, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing else. Passing. Good work. — ΛΧΣ21™ 18:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]