Talk:Coca-Cola Amatil

Food and drink: Beverages Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Coca-Cola Amatil is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

Is this right?

"had after-tax profits of 238 million AUD in the 2003 calendar year on revenues of 3,751 thousand million Australian dollars." So $238 profit for $3,751,000 revenue? Seems unlikely. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.113.200.252 (talk • contribs) .

238,000,000 of 3,751,000,000 or 238 of 3,751 (please double check your figures in future) seems very likely. Pretty much all the large companies have margins like that... actually I'd say they'd have smaller margins. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 09:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

attack ad from greenpeace and its place in this article.

I will use an analogy. If I were to take out a billboard saying "User:JessicabrownGPAP is a stinking prostitute", would that be valid information for inclusion in User:JessicabrownGPAP's biography? How is greenpeace's ad attacking coke any different? It is NOT neutral editing in any way shape or form. If there were facts in the edit other than the fact that greenpeace made the ad, and those facts were sourced to reliable sources, those facts might be included. But the existence of an ad that is slamming the subject of the article is not a reliable source for the validity of the viewpoints expressed in that ad, any more than my billboard would be. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:15, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note the following was capied from my talk page Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:20, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant Information

− − Hi Gtwfan, you were very quick to delete the information I just posted onto the Coca-Cola Amatil page. It is both neutral and relevant as the advertisement was targeting Coca-Cola. It is very similar in tone and information to the coverage of a Greenpeace ad targeting Kit Kat which you will find in the Boycot section. Pl

− Please stop deleting the section, and I am happy to take on board any advise you would like to offer to make the article more neutral in your eyes.

− JessicabrownGPAP (talk) 11:13 pm, Today (UTC−6)

The material on Kit Kat's page presented a balanced account of the controversy, with reliably sourced references supporting both Greenpieace's and KitKat's views. There is no such material in the edit you keep edit warring in to this article. Your username is not hard to decipher; you obviously align yourself with Greepeace's viewpoints. That in itself is not a problem. When you edit in a manor such as to support those viewpoints, that is a problem. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality and Sources

I saw fit to insert the "Multiple issues" template as I do not agree with the neutrality standard and overall business-like tone, in multiple sections, including the Introduction, Countries Served, Ownership, and History. Reads like a company presentation, and has no sources. Could anybody begin verification of info and making the tone more neutral, please? Anton-2492 (talk) 23:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Coca-Cola Amatil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Change of Chairperson and updated Logo

The Chairman changed last year and is now Ilana Atlas ^[1] ^[2]

There is also a new logo with a bolded Amatil as can be seen on their corporate website ^[3]

Can someone make the changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lavenderbay40 (talk • contribs) 06:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

[1] ttps://www.ccamatil.com/en/our-company/our-board-of-directors

[2] ttp://www.smh.com.au/business/cbd/coke-is-no-longer-it-for-cocacola-amatil-as-david-gonski-exits-as-chairman-20170516-gw5oki.html

[3] ttps://www.ccamatil.com/

[1]

[2]

[3]