Talk:Cobell v. Salazar

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Update needed

This article needs updating.... AnonMoos 03:29, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also needs review for bias, re: Lamberth, fractionation. Lawsuit alleges mismanagement, fraud, record destruction, and lack of any sort of accounting system for this trust. Fractionation is beside the point, and only serves to divert attention toward the poor Dept. of Interior and its insurmountable task (of not mismanaging money siphoned from Indians in poverty). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.245.31.183 (talk) 11:47, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The proposed settlement of Dec 8, 2009 has allocated $2 billion dollars for dealing with fractionation issues. Studerby (talk) 20:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Studerby. Fractionation is at the heart of the Cobell litigation. I'm hoping to work on updating and providing citations for this article soon...KTRuppel 19:43, 12 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newedeka (talk • contribs)

There have been a number of developments in this case since the article appears to have last been updated. Potential expansions to include President Obama and Secretary Salazar's comments on the case, as well as the most recent decision handed down this past summer.--Middkdr (talk) 04:28, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dawes Act

It seems to me that a lot of the information in this article would better go in the article Dawes Act (General Allotment Act) -- it actually gives a more detailed discussion of the implementation & problems of the Act than the stuff already in that article. Then a briefer background, with a "Main article at" wikilink to the Dawes Act, could be provided. Of course, references/citations would be really helpful too -- this article's General Allotment Act discussion is sorely lacking them.

Thoughts? --Yksin 23:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Empty Sections?

I noticed that "Contempt Trials" and "Historical Accounting Trial" are empty sections and were introduced. Does anybody know the purpose of these? I'm personally inclined to remove them as they have no content, but I'm unfamiliar with the playing field. Thanks Hasteur (talk) 20:59, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. 67.101.6.33 (talk) 19:34, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cobell v. Salazar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080907021904/http://www.doi.gov/bia/docs/internet%20reconnect%20order.pdf to http://www.doi.gov/bia/docs/internet%20reconnect%20order.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cobell v. Salazar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080625211939/http://www.doi.gov/bia/ to http://www.doi.gov/bia/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]