Talk:Coat of arms of Ecuador

Ecuador Low‑importance

	Ecuador portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ecuador, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ecuador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EcuadorWikipedia:WikiProject EcuadorTemplate:WikiProject EcuadorEcuador articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Heraldry and vexillology

Coat of arms of Ecuador is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coat of arms of Ecuador. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060817102355/http://www.presidencia.gov.ec/modulos.asp?id=19 to http://www.presidencia.gov.ec/modulos.asp?id=19

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with historical coats of arms

The historical coats of arms in this article are a bit misleading. The main issue is that the astrological symbols for the "1860-1900" coat of arms are incorrect -- they are shown to be Aries, Gemini, Pisces, and Cancer, but should be Aries, Taurus, Gemini, and Cancer. Not sure this specific category needs to exist at all, however, as the coat of arms used in 1845 is identical to the one used today, it was just officially codified in 1900. The only change from the 1845 version is that the new tricolor is used in accordance with the change of the flag in 1860.

Interestingly, the 1830-1835 version of the coat of arms in this article also employs the same set of erroneous astrological symbols as above. Even if the symbols were correct (again, they are not), they would have had no significance as the events to which they refer had not yet occurred. A more accurate (though lower quality) coat of arms can be found here: File:Escudo Ecuador 1830.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

Other versions without the encompassing shield can be found in this scholarly paper: Microsoft Word - a.- Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.doc (uasb.edu.ec), and this original pressing: Escudo1830_matamoros.JPG (970×684) (bp.blogspot.com).

A colorized version can also be found here: Ecuadorarms (hubert-herald.nl), though I'm not sure what the original source is, though the article laying out the coat of arms does specify a blue background. But in summary, the astrological symbols were not present in this coat of arms and need to be removed here as well as corrected in the 1860-1900 version (or this version can simply be removed and a note added that this was de facto the coat of arms from 1860-1900 and was made official in 1900). Rendolak (talk) 16:48, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]