Talk:Coastal fortifications of New Zealand/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:17, 10 June 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This looks very nice, but a citation is needed for every battery in addition to the ones I've already noted.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

   web citations need publisher, date of access, date of publication (if given) and author (if given). Books need publisher and place of publication.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Complete dates of completion and decommissioning would be nice for each battery if available.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Failed for lack of response.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:13, 3 July 2010 (UTC)