Talk:Coalfields Regeneration Trust

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability since December 2007

Thanks for notability tagging. Still you have to consider here a process of creation.

The outside notability is :

Results = about 9,350 for "coalfields regeneration trust" in a standard search engine, being between quotes, for the trust itself. References may be searched before creating a stub. Here I apologize. See that the external link states clearly the action of the trust - of which I am nothing as being in France since 1953. References may also be searched before tagging. What do you think ?

The inside (WP) notability is ascertained by three references : I created this stub against the red links I found haphazard.

The process is making the stub richer with external information and references if needed and more links that are examples of the trust's action. It is not tagging quicker and quicker.

As for the cat, the question is the same, it might be quicker to better categorize than to tag ... thank you. -- DLL ^{.. T} 20:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~Feel free to add a few independent sources to help establish notability and delete the tag~~. I spend a block of time patrolling new pages and tagging/deleting as needed. I then go back and try to help clean up where I can. It is a justified tag and can be deleted as soon as someone has the time to resolve the issues. Cheers Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 20:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

never mind... I added some. :) Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 21:17, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]