Talk:Co-cathedral

Catholicism Low‑importance

Co-cathedral is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Repeated vandalism

I am not an expert in the technicalities, procedures and formalities of Wikipedia. Usually, I just contribute a bit where I can without stepping on the toes of anyone. Hence I can only ask a few that I found to know better, Daniel Case and Lord Roem, for their help. Personally, I am not interested in this specific article, and not invested in it. But when I've seen vandalism in it, I, stupidly, tried to revert it. I did not do it in the correct way. Now, the vandalism continues, and I let it go. But there are others, maybe also not experts in editing Wikipedia, who try to prevent the mass deletion of stuff without proper discussion. The one who does this mass deletion has changing IPs so none of us know anything about her/his expertise, but yet s/he feels well in bashing those who revert what seems to be vandalism. So, it is now in your good hands. Again, I am not a part of this discussion about Co-cathedrals. Thanks, Agmonsnir (talk) 07:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is far to much uncited detil in this article, which has been falgged since at least 2017. Removing unreferenced material is not vandalism, although the IP doing it could have discussed more and reverted less. I would suggest the best way forward is to find proper referencing for all the unreferenced sections. That way it won't be removed in future. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 15:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]