Talk:Clutter (advertising)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

About Original Research

Alright, I watched a PBS video called the Persuaders which mentions this. There's my citation. At any rate, the concept certainly exists. Roman Soldier 02:11, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I return with a valid citation from the above program. "This clutter creates a dilemma for advertisers, Garfield observes. "The advertisers know they need to have more and more advertising to get an ever narrower slice of your attention," he says. "And that means we are going to be ever more inundated. And then of course ever more resistant, requiring ever more advertising, making us ever more resistant and so on." http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/persuaders/etc/synopsis.html Roman Soldier 02:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The show used the word to express an idea. That doesn't mean it created a new marketing term. -- Perfecto 02:20, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're not going to give up, are you? Here are some more links where clutter is used in this way.

http://www.questia.com/library/communication/advertising-and-public-relations/advertising-research/advertising-clutter.jsp http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=clutter+marketing+advertising

Will you removed the OR tag or shall I? Roman Soldier 03:13, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising clutter is the term, then. It gives 230K hits in Google. Isn't it a lot better when we provide sources to our edits? -- Perfecto 11:42, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like to move this page to Clutter (advertising) that's fine with me, although clutter is a problem for both fields, which are well connected to each other. Roman Soldier 19:58, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clutter (advertising). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051103213420/http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2002/apr02/apr01/5_fri/news2friday.html to http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2002/apr02/apr01/5_fri/news2friday.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]