Talk:Clover Records

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 June 2010. The result of the discussion was no consensus, default to keep.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Record Labels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Music Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Music portal This article is supported by WikiProject American music (assessed as Low-importance).

Protect

Do you think this artical Should be locked for us older users Finale Wiki Geek 21:37, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why should it? Why did you request protection for it? Wondering, -- Infrogmation 23:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, It did not make the lock so... I guess it will not be for lockdown. Finale Wiki Geek (talk) 22:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you undid my changes, you could of edited and removed the sign Finale Wiki Geek (talk) 22:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing I reverted was your placement of an "edit protected" template on the article, which was inappropriate since the article was not edit protected. Please explain what you are trying to do and why you think the article is in such danger that it needs edit protection. (It seems to me to be rather seldom edited much less heavily vandalized.) Also, what is the meaning of adding template categories like "Founded: None"? Puzzled, -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I did not think about it first so I am sorry if it made you puzzled. I also need some more info... Is there like a record wiki that could help because I need some help. The thing is that it needs to be a requirement for the table. Is is alright if I make a table for all the stuff we know about it.Finale Wiki Geek (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shellac 78 record era company. I argue that record companies from this era tend to be notable in themselves, as making records in that era needed a considerable amount of industrial investment, quite unlike how easy it was to start what was called a "record company" in recent decades. Listed in Rust's record label book. Pre-Great depression US label. Infrogmation (talk) 13:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Link for future expansion

The following link 78s The Stone Collection gives

OH! HOW I MISS YOU TONIGHT (Davis, Fisher & Burke). George Beaver. Tenor solo. 1563-B (3560).
IF I HAD SOMEBODY LIKE YOU (Jo.Trent). Chas. Hart. Tenor Solo.

--Technopat (talk) 22:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]