Talk:Clover (creature)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]- Lead needs expansion... no mention of reception, etc.
- Newspaper/magazine publishers in refs need italics. (random example; Boston Globe)
- "The creature was realized by visual effects supervisor Kevin Blank and Phil Tippett's company Tippett Studio." - was realized by? Not sure what that's supposed to mean...
- "Abrams described the creature as a "baby"" - does this need to be quoted?
Overall an interesting read. Leave me a note when done please. Cheers, giggy (:O) 05:30, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- I have fixed the things you have noted. Let me know if you have more, or if it meets the GA standard. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- The first point makes no sense. They want a description of the reception of a monster? The last two points are nonsensical. 'Was realised by' is perfectly good English, and if Abrams himself is being quoted, why shouldn't there be quote marks? It's not like a 30-storey monstrosity is the image that springs to mind for the word 'baby.' Herr Gruber (talk) 17:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- I have fixed the things you have noted. Let me know if you have more, or if it meets the GA standard. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)