Talk:Cloud Kingdoms/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 21:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey, another one. Cognissonance (talk) 21:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Gameplay
[edit]- Link "top-down perspective" to Top-down perspective.
- On the negative side WP:POV
Reception and legacy
[edit]- Reviews for Cloud Kingdom on Amiga computers were mixed I don't get that impression from reading the paragraph.
Overall
[edit]Looks good. Is there a particular reason you like adding info about the price? I don't mind, but it's mostly unheard of. Cognissonance (talk) 10:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @Cognissonance:. I addressed the concerns under gameplay but, regarding the mixed reviews, I agree with you that "mixed" probably isn't a perfect way to describe the results, but I'm not sure what might be better summary. Would it be better to just omit the first sentence altogether and let the reviews speak for themselves per WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV? In regards to the price, I included it when I was working on the Llamatron article, because the fact that it was shareware at a low price was important to its notability based on the money it generated. I then included it in Star Goose because reviews for the budget release felt that it was a better value for the money at the lower price point and consequently it got better reviews. I suppose here it's not as important, but I do find the price points to be somewhat informative (and the differences were notable enough to be mentioned in at least some of the sources). Canadian Paul 12:09, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Since the lowest score (besides the 5 out of 10 from Datormagazin) is 71% from Amiga Joker, I suggest switching "mixed" to "positive". Cognissonance (talk) 12:53, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Alright @Cognissonance:, that makes sense, so I've gone ahead and made the change. Please let me know what else needs to be done. Canadian Paul 13:25, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- No, that's pretty much it. Great quality on both nominations. Passed. Cognissonance (talk) 13:51, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Great! Thanks again for taking the time to do both reviews! Canadian Paul 16:48, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- No, that's pretty much it. Great quality on both nominations. Passed. Cognissonance (talk) 13:51, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Alright @Cognissonance:, that makes sense, so I've gone ahead and made the change. Please let me know what else needs to be done. Canadian Paul 13:25, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Since the lowest score (besides the 5 out of 10 from Datormagazin) is 71% from Amiga Joker, I suggest switching "mixed" to "positive". Cognissonance (talk) 12:53, 7 July 2018 (UTC)