Jump to content

Talk:Clive Caldwell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Can we have an explanation for the term "aerial gunnery deflection" which appears in this article?

Perhaps military types could help out.

Thanks.

G.

--Gibberer 02:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

At the very least the references should be accurate and complete, I can live with a notes and reference section. Bzuk 12:55, 7 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

That's part of the point. The refs are not correct now. RAAF Historical Section authored Units of the Royal Australian Air Force, it's not part of the volume. And RAAF Darwin is a chapter of that volume. I'm not sure what your issue is with the cite book template, which is a simple way of rendering things consistently. Cheers, Ian Rose 15:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, didn't note that, I will make the correction, as to the cite templates, they are based on an adaption of the APA (American Psychological Association) rather than the more common MLA (Modern Language Association) style guide. These templates were provided as a guide and the MLA style is often used by editors such as myself. Bzuk 16:30, 7 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Infobox images

[edit]

Insert image width (defaults to 180x180px if empty) is the recommended size for infoboxes although most editors choose 200px as a convenient standard. See other biographies- Charles Lindbergh, Amelia Earhart, Baron Von Richtofen. The reason for this size is to ensure that the image does not "stretch" the infobox too much and that it not overwhelm the page. The WP:Aircraft group also recommends that no "hardcoding" of image sizes occurs. Bzuk 13:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair enough. I'm not too fussed on that one, being one of those that tend to choose 200px for convenience, as you say. 250 was big but 150 looked a bit titchy... Cheers, Ian Rose 15:19, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent additions

[edit]

Guys, coupla' quick questions...

  • Bzuk, what exactly's your reasoning behind the sic in "[i]t's (sic) your life or theirs."?
  • Grant, are we sure all of the citations attributed to p.25 of Alexander actually belong there? Pretty sure many do but it seems an awful lot for one page, I don't remember the typeface being that small...!

Cheers, Ian Rose 11:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very minor point, and I am certainly not wedded to it but "t's" is a colloquialism and actually was first written as a correction [i]t's, and that is why I used (spelling incorrect- sic) as a standard designation when a nonstandard usage of a word appears. FWIW Bzuk 12:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Yep, figured it must be the "[i]". Reckon [i]t's all Grant's fault then... ;-) The exact quote from Caldwell in Alexander was "It's your life or theirs." Grant, I think you put in the "[i]" because I'd used the quote as part of a sentence. Personnally I reckon it works better to use the original "It's..." and avoid any need to use sic as well... Cheers, Ian Rose 13:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, change effected. FWIW Bzuk 13:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Ian, you are right on both counts. Thanks for pointing the reference thing out. I never have been able to get the hang of the "reflist" format. For the time being I have changed mine to ordinary old <ref>s Grant | Talk 15:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DFC and Bar

[edit]

The citations published in the London Gazette make it clear that the DFC was for the encounter with 2 Me109s, whilst it was only the Bar which was for shooting down 5 Ju87s, I've re-worded accordingly, I did leave the original cites in because I wasn't absoutley sure what they were supposed to be backing up. I also chagned the style used for quotations to meet WP:QUOTE. David Underdown (talk) 15:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Highest scoring P40 pilot

[edit]

This claim is footnoted, but no sources for the scores are given, ideally their should be a source which definitively lists Caldwell as such, or we're verging on Original research. David Underdown (talk) 17:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration with a view to GA/A/FA

[edit]

Nick-D and I are planning to work on getting this article to FA standard. While I believe we have access to all the important sources, naturally we welcome additional input. If we can discuss any proposals here rather than just going into the article, it will help us avoid tripping over ourselves. At this stage, the division of labour Nick and I have discussed is myself primarily working on the intro, early life, and North Africa, and Nick on the Pacific, and later life.

For a start, I'm listing the existing bibliography and noting access to same, as well as adding a few more that I've used in the past on similar articles; also adding links to additional images. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:20, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Alexander, Kristen. "Cleaning the augean stables". The Morotai Mutiny?. Sabretache. Military Historical Society of Australia, 2004.
  • Alexander, Kristen. Clive Caldwell: Air Ace. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin, 2006. ISBN 1-74114-705-0.
  • Brown, Russell. Desert Warriors: Australian P-40 Pilots at War in the Middle East and North Africa, 1941–1943. Maryborough, Queensland, Australia: Banner Books, 2000. ISBN 1-875-59322-5.
  • Musciano, Walter. "Killer Caldwell: Australia's Ace of Aces." Air Progress Volume 19, No. 3, September 1966.
  • Odgers, George. The Royal Australian Air Force: An Illustrated History. Brookvale, Australia: Child & Henry, 1984. ISBN 0-86777-368-5.
  • Pentland, Geoffrey. The P-40 Kittyhawk in Service. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Kookaburra Technical Publications Pty. Ltd., 1974. ISBN 0-85880-012-8.
  • RAAF Historical Section, "RAAF Base Darwin", in Units of the Royal Australian Air Force: A Concise History. Volume 1: Introduction, Bases, Supporting Organisations. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Public Service, 1995. ISBN 0-64442-792-2.
  • Shores, Christopher. Aces High – Volume 2: A Further Tribute to the Most Notable Fighter Aces of the British and Commonwealth Air Forces in World War II. London: Grub Street, 1999. ISBN 1-902304-03-9.
  • Stephens, Alan. The Royal Australian Air Force: A History. London: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 0-19555-541-4.
  • Watson, Jeffrey. Killer Caldwell. Sydney, Australia: Hodder, 2005. ISBN 0-73361-929-0.
  • Weal, John. Jagdgeschwader 27 'Afrika'. London: Osprey Publishing, 2003. ISBN 1-841765-38-4.

Others that may prove useful are:

or written out as:

  • The relevant official histories should be utilised, particularly for context, online:
  • Helson, Peter. Ten Years at the Top. Sydney Australia: University of New South Wales, 2006.
  • Newton, Dennis. Australian Air Aces. Fyshwick, ACT: Aerospace Publications, 1996. ISBN 1-87567-125-0.
  • Newton, Dennis. Clash of Eagles. Kenthurst, NSW: Kangaroo Press, 1996. ISBN 0-86417-793-3.
  • Thomas, Andrew. Tomahawk and Kittyhawk Aces of the RAF and Commonwealth. Oxford, UK: Osprey, 2005. ISBN 978-1841760834.
  • Wilson, David. The Brotherhood of Airmen. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin, 2005. ISBN 1-74114-333-0.

Images

[edit]

The infobox portrait at the moment is an excellent shot, more thoughtful-looking than the usual Caldwell image, but for that reason I'm not sure it's the one for the infobox (though I think it should definitely appear somewhere in the article). Something a bit more representative of his public image might be more appropriate, such as the one currently in the South West Pacific section, but I'm interested in opinions before changing anything.

Here are links to a few other images that could end up in the article somewhere, and a new infobox image may be among them:

North Africa, 1942 -- useful shot in front of a Kittyhawk, presumably in 250SQN RAF
North Afrcia, 1942 -- decent portrait, presumably same shoot as above
Northern territory, 1943 -- very Hollywood, but a good portrait that conforms to pulic image without being too well-known
July 1943 -- classic shot, perhaps too ubiquitous for the infobox but might be worthwhile elsewhere
July 1943 -- good portrait, presumably from same shoot as above, that again conforms to the image without being too well-known
Northern Territory, 1843 -- interesting for the beard, at least!
Darwin, 1944 -- no beard or moustache at all, just to be different...!
Northern Territory, 1944 -- rare shot of him in the same frame as a decent view of his Spit
Morotai, 1945 -- another interesting portrait, with a pet parrot no less!
...and then there are the pair of him in the Morotai Mutiny article, either of which might work here. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:20, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If it wasn't for the parrot the last one would be a great choice for the infobox... The article should include a photo of Caldwell with a beard as this was how he looked for much of his time in Darwin (due to skin infections brought on by the tropical climate). Nick-D (talk) 07:10, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clive Caldwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]