Talk:Clipper route

Sailing Low‑importance

	Clipper route is within the scope of the WikiProject Sailing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sailing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.SailingWikipedia:WikiProject SailingTemplate:WikiProject SailingSailing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Maritime High‑importance

	Australia portal Clipper route is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Good sailing time?

"A good sailing time for the 3,275 miles to this point would have been around 21 days; however, an unlucky ship could spend up to three weeks crossing the doldrums" --- is this some kind of joke? Even my dog knows 21 days equals 3 weeks [Unsigned]

If the passage is read carefully, it means that a good sailing time from England is 21 days, then an additional 3 weeks might be needed to pass through the doldrums to the S trade winds --mervyn 15:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re-phrased.Pustelnik (talk) 14:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rating

Rated as start class, need to begin process to upgrade to B. Pustelnik (talk) 14:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citations?

The outward bound course, described as staying west in the Southern Atlantic appears to contradict Chichester's research in Gipsy Moth, and Admiralty Ocean Passages for the World 1954 (sailing section 1927 drawn from commercial sail records.)

Modern use contains a specific error regarding the Sunday Times Golden Globe Race, stating only Robin Knox-Johnston completed a circumnavigation. In fact, both Knox-Johnston and Moitessier completed circumnavigations; Knox-Johnston completed the race, while Moitessier continued on around the globe another half circumnavigation to the Society Islands - failing to complete the race even though he was in the lead when he decided not to finish it. - Amgine (talk) 05:10, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vito Dumas

It should also be mentioned Vito Dumas sailed the high latitudes route during WW II, 20 some years before Chichester. - Amgine (talk) 06:21, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Slocum

The Variations section that describes Slocum circumnavigating by way of Cape Horn is incorrect, I think. To the best of my knowledge, Slocum used the Strait of Magellan to pass from the Atlantic to the Pacific. I have no recollection of him ever rounding Isla Hornos proper. My recollection would seem to be supported by Wiki Slocum entry: [[1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trane Francks (talk • contribs) 07:25, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great Circle?

The route on the map is not a Great Circle; it keeps to the 40°S parallel. jnestorius^(talk) 21:09, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Homeward voyage the City of Adelaide

This is not the clipper route. It goes against all other descriptions used in this same article and by every other user of the term. 166.137.208.30 (talk) 07:28, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clipper route. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051210040654/http://www.dehaa.sa.gov.au/ to http://www.dehaa.sa.gov.au/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]