Talk:Clinton Doctrine

International relations: United Nations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Problem with this article

This article doesn't cite anyone who actually calls this alleged doctrine the Clinton Doctrine. Probably a good candidate for AFD. Tempshill 17:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who says you have to? What the Clinton Doctrine is defined as is fairly well-known-- which brings me to my next point: Why is this article considered non-notable? The Clinton Doctrine IS a foreign policy doctrine of the United States, and people, including academics in the foreign relations field, do use it to describe the humanitarian slant that the United States took after the end of the Cold War. After the Kennan Doctrine, the Clinton Doctrine was intended to be a major shift in post-Cold War thinking. Obviously, 9/11 changed this, but while it was in effect, it guided American foreign policy for two terms of Clinton, and even the first part of Bush's first year in office.GrumF14 18:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Historians have been debating the issue for years with no consensus. The current version now makes clear the multiple possiblities for "Clinton Doctrine". Rjensen (talk) 03:25, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clinton Doctrine not a clear statement?

The article claims that the Clinton Doctrine is just a small quote blurb. As far as I know, however, the Clinton Doctrine is a rather large set of guidelines on troop deployment, with the NSS-96 (http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/nss/nss-96.htm) at its core. While the general idea of the doctrine is captured in this wikipedia article, it seems to suggest that no proper elaboration of the ideas was ever made, while Clinton in fact did codify his belief in (humanitarian) interventionism. tijmz 20:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citation

The citation for Clinton regretting Rwanda comes from My Life, p. 593, published by Alfred A. Knopf, 2004 in New York.GrumF14 18:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Clinton Doctrine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080828025702/http://www.thenation.com./doc/19990419/klare to http://www.thenation.com/doc/19990419/klare

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:17, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clinton Doctrine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150706001606/http://fas.org/man/docs/qdr/sec3.html to https://fas.org/man/docs/qdr/sec3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]