Talk:Cliff Joslyn

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Cybernetics.

Worksection removed

Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed the worksection of this article for now. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 08:57, 10 October 2009 (UTC) P.S. I apologize for all inconvenience I have caused here, see also here. If you would like to assist in improving this article, please let me know. I can use all the help I can get. Thank you.[reply]

Worksection restored

As the original author of the worksection, I have restored it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.20.179.178 (talk) 03:56, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I noticed, thanks. If I am not mistaken, I technically am still the original author of the worksection, and you the author of the three to five quotes I used. I guess the mistake I made in similar articles is, that I didn't make a clear distinction between the new text, and the original sources used. In this case, see here, I guess these problems were not that obvious, because I did used quotation-marks in three places. And for example the last text:

...Other application areas include homeland defense, critical infrastructure protection, intelligence analysis, decision support environments, risk and reliability analysis, and defense transformation. [ source: http://www.c3.lanl.gov/cic3/teams/knowledge/ ].

This text does not have to be quoted (in quotation-marks) because it came from a (federal) government website, I guess. As you can see there is still a lot of guessing from my site. Again I am sorry for the confusion I caused. In time I want to double-check, restore, and further improve... and maybe get back on this. -- Mdd (talk) 08:34, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Updated May 2012

Updated by the subject for accuracy and language, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.65.14 (talk) 02:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cliff Joslyn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:54, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]