Jump to content

Talk:Clemencia Rodriguez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

concerning the notability notice

[edit]
  • Started this entry, soon received notice "that the subject of the article does not satisfy the notability guideline for Biographies." Rewrote text right away to add citations and bring out notability element. I've recently completed a PhD dissertation on this area of communication research, including an extensive literature review and after 5 years of research and dozens of conferences attended, found Rodriguez' importance second only to John Downing's. I've confirmed this with numerous other scholars in the field. Her Fissures is considered one of the 2-4 seminal books that appeared around 2001 which helped spark the current wave of interest in alternative media reasearch, and one of the first to attempt critique and go beyond the simplistic alternative-mainstream dichotomy. Googlescholar does not accurately reflect the amount of research that cites her, as few are available online.
  • I would also point to the discussion around establishing 'importance' of academic researchers, especially the critique that the criteria for 'importance' have traditionally favor old men from first world countries (who tend to quote primarily other white men). If wikipedia is to be more relevant to what is going on in research, we'd better not wait until someone is dead to write about them, and take care not to exclude female researchers.
  • Finally, Wikipedia is dreadfully understocked in entries in media and communication reasearch- contrast this with entries in the natural sciences or popular culture. I would recommend approaching the leading associations of researchers in the field, IAMCR, ICA etc. for collaboration.

Bine maya 10:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    • I think the comment about lacking in "notability" is way off target. I attended the OURMedia06 conference in Sydney last week, and this lady plays an important role in that network. She is also a prominent academic in that field. --fredericknoronha 10:48, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • the notability guideline required is not 'for living persons' but 'for academics'- with a little clearer formulation, several of the points can be covered. e.g. her work is widely quoted in academic publications, her theory of 'citizens media' widely referred to and critically debated in scholarship and included in a recent imporant anthology in the field. need more time to get that down though. anyone else qualified welcome to add. Bine maya 16:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • her work is cited in all major research about alternative media published since 2002 (and many even before that). some papers that cite her:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&cites=12795099185706916837 questioning notability tag should really be taken off. it's insulting and just shows the person who tagged it doesn;t know much. as for the text needing revisions with more citations, will take care off that sometime in the next few months. anyone else is welcome to add. Bine maya 14:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Clemencia Rodriguez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia admin: The side box on the entry for Clemencia Rodríguez (which is me) seems to have a problem. The photo is gone and the format is wrong. You can see it here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clemencia_Rodriguez

Thanks, Clemencia

˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clemencia59 (talk • contribs) 13:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Clemencia_Rodriguez&oldid=1204551543"