Talk:Cleator and Workington Junction Railway

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cleator and Workington Junction Railway article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Removed text

Following text removed from article (more appropriate to a talk page): "This entry has been extensively altered to correct the mistakes made by previous contributors. All the altered text can be verified by information held by The Cumbrian Railways Association." Folks at 137 (talk) 11:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Locomotives

As the locomotives section is quite long I am thinking of moving it to a separate article. This has already been done for the major railways, e.g. Locomotives of the London and North Western Railway. Please discuss. Biscuittin (talk) 07:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

I have reverted the addition of the following text:

Mention of the nameplate "Rothersyke" being transferred to "Ennerdale"is not mentioned in C&WJR Company minutes so this information regarding being renamed Rothersyke is suspect. In order to rename an engine one would think it would need BOD approval and be minuted.

This was misplaced - commentary belongs on this talk page, not in the article.

Locomotive names need not be a Board matter - and it is in fact rare for directors to concern themselves with such things. Some railways honoured their directors by naming locos after them - and in such cases the individual director would be asked for permission - but it would not be a matter for the Board as a whole. Loco names would be shown in the asset register or the maintenance records, not in the Board minutes. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]