Talk:ClearSign Technologies/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: CorporateM (talk · contribs) 04:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Good start! I don't think this article is ready for a GA review yet. I've provided a few notes below. CorporateM (Talk) 04:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- The Lead should summarize the entire article
- History generally goes before Products
- There are various spacing issues before citations
- Please see WP:ORGAWARDS regarding the award
- "Rutkowski was a co-founder of projection technology company Microvision and nanotechnology company Lumera" Avoid going off-topic by discussing executives rather than the company
- "
according to the company," I think in the case of the amount raised in an IPO, we can trust them and not need attribution - "A company press release" This is a poor use of a primary source
- I'm not sure a small company like this will be able to reach GA standards for comprehensiveness, because the volume of sources required to make a comprehensive piece probably do not exist. Would suggest a strong stub.
- Suggest moving the image of HQ to the infobox.