Talk:ClearPlay
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Deathawk (talk) suspects that this article (specifically this version) may be a copyright violation, but without a source this cannot be definitively determined. |
clearplay vs hd-disk
[edit]Clearplay does fine with dvds, but some people are getting stuff like blu-ray and hd-dvd instead. What format will clearplay use in the future? Will it use both? will security be an issue? will it combo with dvd?
96.228.19.6 00:38, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Any Similar for Computers?
[edit]Has anyone heard of something similar for the computer? 2,000 titles might sound like a lot, but unless you are only into high profit Hollywood new releases, you are most likely SOL. I did a search for my top 5 favorite movies and only "Fight Club" showed up. Also, I would like to be able to edit my own filters, go through some movies and pick out what I might feel is inappropriate for a particular audience, rather than let someone else decide that for me. There are a ton of really good movies that I feel people should watch, but could easily have been done with out some of the words or maybe that sex scene. It is a really good idea but I am hoping for more control in this type of product/software. --Billy Nair (talk) 10:29, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Also, I would like to be able to edit my own filters, go through some movies and pick out what I might feel is inappropriate for a particular audience, rather than let someone else decide that for me. Wow! Talk about a oxymoron! --BeckiGreen (talk) 19:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Does "you" belong in an encyclopedia?
[edit]I noticed that the article uses "you" quite a bit in the "how it works" paragraph. Maybe it shouldn't. It just does not very encyclopedic to me. Rengaw01 (talk) 13:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that also. I am replacing the you's with the word user.--BeckiGreen (talk) 19:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Copying issues
[edit]The first paragraph is near verbatim (with minor word substitutions) from the ClearPlay web site. This seems inappropriate. It would not be acceptable in academic circles, and should not be here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.55.220.84 (talk) 19:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
References
[edit]I'm trying to add some references here, but the main text of this article seems very cluttered. It might have to be reworked with the actual references. --Orwellian Python (talk) 13:43, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
TVGuardian
[edit]Why is TVguardian's website linked to in the References section? If they had a Wiki page, I could see linking to that, but even so that's a bit sketchy. I'm going to remove it unless someone has an objection Sushilover boy (talk) 15:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
This article reads like a Press release
[edit]This article reads like a press release. Statements like-The ClearPlay company is adapting its technology to sources beyond DVD, sound like they were written by the company. Also I am removing dead links in this article.--BeckiGreen (talk) 19:52, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright Problem.
[edit]There seems to be a copyright problem that I accidently walked into the middle of. The current opening line in the "How it works" section is not sourced correctly. This is because when I used the last correctly sourced version from the backlog it made me suspicious that it was copywritten for some reason. I googled the sentence and I found it listed here at something called The "Edited movie encyclapedia" While it could be that the site is copying Wikipedia, the weird wording and tone suspects that there's something more going on here. --Deathawk (talk) 13:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)