Talk:Clean (2022 film)/GA1

GA Review

Unsuccessful. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 22:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quickfailing this on broadness. The bulk of the article is synopsis. The article cites RT having "15 reviews", but only cites two. We don't have to cite them all, but 2/15 is unacceptable. There's no information about background, filming, or production. The screenings at film festivals are only mentioned in the lead, not the body.

Also, the entire sentence "The film was described as being "shot plainly" without fanfare, although one critic did call the addition of re-enactments of events from Pankhurst's past an "unnecessary major misstep"." lacks in-text attribution for its assertions - who described it that way? What critic? Writing for whomst?

The article needs to be substantially expanded before being nominated again. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.