Talk:Tarzan (1999 film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tarzan (1999 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Disney High‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media franchises Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American / Films High‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as High-importance).

Animals in media (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animals in media, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Animals in mediaWikipedia:WikiProject Animals in mediaTemplate:WikiProject Animals in mediaAnimals in media articles

United States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: The talk page contains multiple copies of an article. Check whether any of them should be used somewhere. If not, the article should maybe be deleted from the talk page. Please help improve this article if you can.

Overlinking and OR

There is no reason to link to commonly understood terms. Please see WP:OVERLINK.

This is a cartoon. The specific species of various animals is neither specified (in the film or in sources) nor relevant. - SummerPhD^v2.0 03:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Musical?

A few editors have been adding musical as a genre in the first sentence. I disagree that this film is a musical; if consensus develops against my opinion, I then suggest that it shouldn't belong in the first sentence. I am primarily relying on the policy WP:FILMLEAD.

FILMLEAD states that "Genre classifications should comply with WP:WEIGHT and represent what is specified by a majority of mainstream reliable sources." I am not well-informed on what sources are reliable when it comes to film, but I started with the top reviews at Rotten Tomatoes. First, I should say that RT itself does label this film a musical. However, of the first eight top reviews, only one describes Tarzan as a musical. Four of the sources specifically mention how the movie breaks away from Disney/broadway style musicals.

Research on 8 reviews

Found at Rotten Tomatoes "Top Critics"

Common Sense Media: '"Family and Kids"
Chicago Reader: "animated musical-romance-adventure"
Time Out: "animated", also mentions "use of Phil Collins' songs as accompaniment rather than as sung musical set-pieces."
SFGATE: "animated", also says "breaking from the Broadway musical mold embraced in recent Disney animation productions"
Village Voice: "animated" (note: RT link was broken)
ReelViews: "animated", also says "the Magic Kingdom has produced a non-musical animated film" and mentions songs in the film but that they're not "integrated into the plot"
Roger Ebert: "Family, Drama, Animation, Adventure"
Austin Chronicle: doesn't seem to mention a genre, does say:
Most surprising are the songs by Phil Collins. Unlike the usual Disney sing-alongs, the rock drummer's music is used primarily as an effective bridge between sequences. Only once does the movie stop for one of those cute show-tune set-pieces, and it seems out of place amid the otherwise propulsive jungle drumbeats.

Other evidence: one source currently in the article (Animated Views in which the director is interviewed. It seems that maybe he and the reviewer are discussing Tarzan as a musical, but they are also mentioning ways in which it differs from musicals. Screen Rant calls it a non-musical. Chicago Tribune wrote a piece during production that details how the Disney execs and producers deliberately were trying to depart from the musical genre.

I am open to good-faith debate about this (mostly trivial) matter, but I believe the burden is on whoever adds "musical" to the article to justify that it is described often enough as such to belong in this article. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 17:48, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. You are following the rules and even making the extra effort to start a discussion, (with research too) which is what the other editor should have done.

User 83.23.89.23 is genre spamming across multiple articles, his edit history is full of "Reverted", and is clearly not editing in good faith. -- 109.76.141.135 (talk) 22:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Disney's Tarzan (video game) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:18, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Plot rewrite

Sjones23 can you explain why you restored the original? Banedon (talk) 05:17, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, there. I restored the previous plot summary as per WP:BRD rather than risk a potential edit war. I'm also concerned about the potential scene-by-scene recaps, which should be avoided per WP:FILMPLOT. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMPLOT doesn't say avoid scene-by-scene recaps. It says avoid scene-by-scene breakdowns. The differences in the two sections of the text look superficial, except one version does not mention the stampede at all, and I don't see why. Banedon (talk) 05:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment, the WP:STATUSQUO version of the plot summary doesn't include the opening stampede, since it could be a minor detail and plot summaries are meant to be concise. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you suggesting the stampede is a minor detail? Are you also suggesting that there is an edit war ongoing over the section? Banedon (talk) 07:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick word regarding the invoking of STATUSQUO. First and foremost, this is an essay, not a policy or guideline, but it is a common behavior during a dispute that shares the spirit of existing policies WP:EPTALK and WP:NOCON. As noted in its guidance, the purpose of doing so is to reduce "the risk of an edit war"; it does not say you must already be in one. Seek consensus, and when it does not work through editing, take your efforts to a discussion. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, I don't recall having ever watched this film so I'm just going off the plot summary. I think that the SJones version is marginally better as it cuts some fluff, though I think the point made in the Banedon version, "When Sabor attacks the gorillas and defeats Kerchak, Tarzan intervenes and kills Sabor with a spear, gaining Kerchak's reluctant approval" adds context whereas the SJones version makes it sound like Tarzan just spiked Sabor one day, possibly while he was on the toilet. Same with "Clayton mortally wounds Kerchak and fights Tarzan across the treetops, but inadvertently strangles himself to death", the lack of mentioning vines that is present in the Banedon version makes it sound like a David Carradine incident. That's my two cents. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 19:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List formatting fix needed

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the cast list section please replace all instances of X ":*" with Y "**"

This should have no visual change. To explain it you would need to read and understand Help:List and also understand a bit about how HTML works. In short it is incorrect to mix different list types, as it produces multiple short lists instead of a single list with nested items. This is an easy fix, understanding why it should be done is the hard part. -- 109.77.199.70 (talk) 19:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(diff) Thank you. -- 109.77.203.168 (talk) 07:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

error

"Baboons" is spelled wrong 2601:147:4300:900:91C6:9C4A:5443:3CC1 (talk) 22:15, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]