Talk:Claybury Hospital

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hospitals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anecdotes

I have created a temporary section entitled "Anecdotes" and moved to it 2 short entries which at present do not fit the main topic. I would suggest that the one about W W Jacobs is deleted as it is not relevant to the subject. The other, about Hennell, doesn't really belong in isolation. BUT he is currently the only representative of the hospital patients. The article presently deals with architecture, environment and hospital policies. It now identifies several staff members. I would therefore like to retain Hennell as a symbol of the real purpose of a hospital until more patient=centred material can be found and added.Petrosbizar (talk) 11:10, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - This sounds good to me. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 11:36, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Job done! Mr Hennell turns out to be far more relevant than I could have possibly imagined! Moral: research carefully before deleting apparently minor material.Petrosbizar (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]