Talk:Clavichord

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Musical Instruments High‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Percussion High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Percussion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Percussion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PercussionWikipedia:WikiProject PercussionTemplate:WikiProject PercussionPercussion articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Europe Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that one or more audio files of a musical instrument or component be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and included in this article to improve its quality by demonstrating the way it sounds or alters sound. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request.

Untitled

The article Tangent (clavichord) should be merged into this article as it does not contain enough information to stand alone and references material unique to this article only. +Fenevad 18:53, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is an error in the text under fretting: which is larger, unfretted (more likely) or fretted clavichords? It says unfretted ones are bigger than unfretted ones.

It would be nice to have some audio examples of the instrument.

There are some in the link to Wikimedia Commons. Graham87 13:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know the Clavichord builder Thomas Steiner lives in Basel, Switzerland, but appears as Austrian in the Text! I live in Basel and actually know where he has his atelier. Prysswerckh (talk) 12:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused by a sentence in the wording underneath the picture of the clavichord's action. It reads, "Note that the key levers are perpendicular to the strings", but it appears to me that the key levers are parallel to the strings. Am I misunderstanding this diagram, or is there a mistake in the text? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.123.96.51 (talk) 19:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The clavichord action diagram is a bit confusing, but can be understood. It does, however, contain actual errors: in stating that point 5 is "bridge pin next to hitch pin" and in point 6 "Damping felt, next to tuning peg." As the text description to the left of the picture makes clear, the tuning peg is next to the bridge pin (on the right-hand side of the instrument), while the felt damper is next to the hitch pin (on the left-hand side of the instrument). Maybe the contributor of the diagram (Berndt Mayer) could come up with a clearer picture with these points corrected? <UkinRanta (talk) 20:19, 18 November 2017 (UTC)>[reply]

New image

I've recently uploaded a 17th century engraving of a woman playing a clavichord (right) by Wenceslas Hollar. Feel free to use or not use. Dcoetzee 00:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It doe not say what materials the instrument is made of. Is the frame of wood or metal? Xxanthippe (talk) 09:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Please explain...

... how the dampers do not damp the string until the tangent loses contact. I cannot see a mechanism that lifts the dampers while the string is vibrating and then replaces them. --2001:44B8:3102:BB00:1C13:7597:BAAC:3566 (talk) 06:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm also confused about the dampening mechanism and how that works. If you take the analogy of the guitar, the note is determined by the finger at the fret/neck to the distance to the bridge - on the clavichord the tangent is apparently equivalent to both the pick and the fret and the damper is equivalent to the bridge. The wikipedia article uses the helpful analogy of the "hammer-on" on guitar, but it's still a bit counterintuitive how it works. Any elaboration from someone more knowledgeable would be helpful. However, the action of a piano is much more confusing, so I don't know what I'm complaining about really. Thanks. 24.185.171.142 (talk) 01:00, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried reading Brauchi's 1998 CUP book? There's also a recording of BWV 989 [1] by Michael Thomas that might help. The commentary says, "The clavichord uses quite a different principle. The depression of the key strikes the string directly thus permitting variation of touch, as well as a form of vibrato." Mathsci (talk) 01:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply, but I don't think that specific quote answers my question. 24.185.171.142 (talk) 09:08, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion about the dates

The year of the German poem--1404--was in the early 15th century, not the 14th. 2601:241:8C00:8BD0:28C6:BC86:A0F2:1877 (talk) 13:45, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Came here to say the same thing. 15th century is correct. 14th century is wrong.

Posting here because Wikipedia is "read-only" for the 99.99%. No point in trying to fix it when it'll just be rolled back within 10 minutes. 174.164.64.186 (talk) 03:15, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]