Talk:Clavering hundred
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in England may be able to help! |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
It seems these are two separate Hundreds, as the counties are non-contiguous (don't touch). If so, there is Original Research here as defined in WP:NOR or more to the point there is an assertion which does not hold true as to the Norfolk Hundred.- Adam37 Talk 18:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class UK geography articles
- Low-importance UK geography articles
- Stub-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- Stub-Class East Anglia articles
- Low-importance East Anglia articles
- WikiProject East Anglia articles
- Wikipedia requested maps in England
- Wikipedia articles that use British English