Talk:Clarks Village

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shopping Centers

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shopping centre operation

Someone had, without discussion, deleted an accurate and cited account of the various changes in Clarks Village and replaced it with a somewhat self-promoting twist on what has occurred; the whole thing read like an advert. We have posted the 'advertisement' preface and have amalgamated the new and old cited information in the hope that it meets all needs

There is a contradiction remaining where Clarks Village claim to have the 'world's largest' shoe topiary - but there is a cited example of a larger shoe topiary in existence at that time and a simple google search reveals much larger show topiaries - if anyone really cares about the size of a shoe shaped hedge perhaps they should remove it

Purpose built

The history and operation of Clarks Village is a current school project for year 10; I think there might be quite a few revisions here over the next term, sorry.

The article describes the centre as 'purpose built' yet describes itself (and it is) a redevelopment of existing shoe factory buildings - in my humble opinion that doesn't make it 'purpose built' - this, coupled with its challenged claim to be the 'first', makes me wonder if the whole paragraph needs to simply read "It opened in 1993"

Artemka (talk) 18:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the contentious claim about "1st purpose built". If anyone has a definitive statement, supported by reliable sources please put it back.— Rod ^talk 19:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clarks Village. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724061123/http://www.realm.ltd.uk/images/corporate-brochure.pdf to http://www.realm.ltd.uk/images/corporate-brochure.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:26, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]