Talk:Claridade

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Africa: Cape Verde Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Cape Verde (assessed as Top-importance).

Cannot understand it

I don't want to persecute User:Pumpie, but I can't understand some of this. - Runcorn 15:31, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article has to be re-written completly (User:atf) 19.02.06

Trimmed recent additions

Hi, I had to trim the recent additions, as the style was more adequate for a literary or historical magazine than for an encyclopedia. Please note that Wikipedia articles should report only relevant facts (incuding the fact that X said Y in an available publication), not the personal interpretations or evaluations of Wikipedia editors. Thus, saying that "Claridade" did something in an "exemplary" way is not OK, unless that has been written in some reputable and independent publication (which should be cited). All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 02:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear reference to "School"

I removed the following paragrpah because I could not understand what was meant by "School":

[...] which established the School as a homogenizing element of the ethnic diversity of the islands, on the assumption that the process of literacy and intellectual development of the population was necessary for the development of a general and clarified awareness. The School launched a hunger for reading that is the basis of the extraordinary cultural development of Cape Verde in the twentieth century.

Is that a specific institution, or a school of thought, or what? In any case, the use of boldface for emphasis is not appropriate here — its proepr use is basically in the opening paragraph, for the topic of the article and equivalent names. All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 02:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it seems that it is the High School mentioned further down the article. Repetition should be avoided. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 03:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tabanca and Bandeiras

The text mentioned ethnographic studies on the "Tabancas" of Santigo and the "Bandeiras" of Fogo. Please clarify. Are those ethnic groups, customs, places, or what? Please provide wikilinks to the corresponding articles (even if these articles do not exist yet). All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 03:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of name

I believe that the name is better translated as "light" than "clarity". The latter nowadays means mostly "intelligibility" which in Portuguese would be "clareza" not "claridade". The metaphor of being a "beacon" for Capeverdanism supports this translation. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 04:43, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Claridade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051120133425/http://www.instituto-camoes.pt/revista/revista1ru.htm to http://www.instituto-camoes.pt/revista/revista1ru.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:16, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Claridade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927164117/http://www.codesria.org/Links/Publications/arb_dec05/almada.pdf to http://www.codesria.org/Links/Publications/arb_dec05/almada.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]