This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Clarice Beckett is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article was created or improved during the Women's History Month edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in March 2018. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
Why is there a section on Australian tonalism and also a section Work and style? Unless anyone objects, and since Beckett practiced and extended tonalism and it is central to her work, not something separate, I'll go ahead and put the two together under Work and style, and retain the link to the main article on Aust. tonalism. Jamesmcardle(talk)05:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For the same reason Monet has a Biography subsection titled "Impressionism", and another section on Method. Beckett's link to Meldrum and adoption of his tonalist system warrants its own subsection. Right now it's really a placeholder until the Life section expands further, then it can be split into more precise subsections. - HappyWaldo (talk) 05:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's appropriate - Monet is quintessentially an Impressionist, Beckett less easy to pigeonhole. Posthumous research and critical examination by Hollinrake, Borlase, McCaughey, Lock and McAuliffe, and Leason writing in her lifetime, place Beckett as more than a Tonalist; they classify her as a Modernist, with Tonalist training which she adapted, rather than merely 'adopted.' Hollinrake, Lock and others' discovery and investigation of her connection via Jorgensen and others to theosophy confirm that rather than practicing a 'scientific' transcription of the subject as did the Tonalists, her concern, beyond 'Method' was with transmitting a spiritual/psychological experience. An additional heading 'Modernist' would thus be appropriate. Jamesmcardle(talk)22:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Beckett is distinguished amongst Australian artists by the radical change in critical reaction to her work. During her lifetime it was generally denigrated, and there are multiple contemporaneous news and journal sources to be cited supporting that perception, but since, even quite early after her death in the case of George Bell, she began to be accepted as having achieved a unique approach, especially to colour in form, departing significantly from the Meldrum Tonalism. A section titled 'Critical reception,' 'Recognition' or the like devoted to that contrast in response could directly address that contrast. Do other editors agree? Jamesmcardle(talk)06:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=logo}
